Poset representations of distributive semilattices
ثبت نشده
چکیده
We prove that for every distributive 〈∨, 0〉-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map μ : P × P → S such that μ(x, z) ≤ μ(x, y)∨μ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that μ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (P1) μ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P . (P2) For all u ≤ v in P and all a,b ∈ S, if μ(v, u) ≤ a ∨ b, then there are a positive integer n and a decomposition u = x0 ≤ x1 ≤ · · · ≤ xn = v such that either μ(xi+1, xi) ≤ a or μ(xi+1, xi) ≤ b, for each i < n. (P3) The subset {μ(x, 0) | x ∈ P} generates the semilattice S. Furthermore, every finite, bounded subset of P has a join, and P is bounded in case S is bounded. Furthermore, the construction is functorial on latticeindexed diagrams of finite distributive 〈∨, 0, 1〉-semilattices.
منابع مشابه
3 N ov 2 00 7 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
We prove that for every distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (P1) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (P2) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) ≤ a ∨ b, then there are a pos...
متن کامل. R A ] 4 J an 2 00 6 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
We prove that for any distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (i) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (ii) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) = a ∨ b, then there are a positi...
متن کاملar X iv : m at h / 06 01 05 8 v 2 [ m at h . R A ] 1 3 Fe b 20 06 POSET REPRESENTATIONS OF DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICES
We prove that for any distributive ∨, 0-semilattice S, there are a meet-semilattice P with zero and a map µ : P × P → S such that µ(x, z) ≤ µ(x, y) ∨ µ(y, z) and x ≤ y implies that µ(x, y) = 0, for all x, y, z ∈ P , together with the following conditions: (i) µ(v, u) = 0 implies that u = v, for all u ≤ v in P. (ii) For all u ≤ v in P and all a, b ∈ S, if µ(v, u) = a ∨ b, then there are a positi...
متن کاملRepresentations of Distributive Semilattices by Dimension Groups, Regular Rings, C*-algebras, and Complemented Modular Lattices
We study the relationships among existing results about representations of distributive semilattices by ideals in dimension groups, von Neu-mann regular rings, C*-algebras, and complemented modular lattices. We prove additional representation results which exhibit further connections with the scattered literature on these diierent topics.
متن کاملThe Monomial Ideal of a Finite Meet-semilattice
Squarefree monomial ideals arising from finite meet-semilattices and their free resolutions are studied. For the squarefree monomial ideals corresponding to poset ideals in a distributive lattice the Alexander dual is computed.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017